The 130-metric ton, evolved SLS vehicle will require an advanced booster with a significant increase in thrust over existing U.S. liquid or solid boosters. Its first full-scale test flight is set for 2017.
The new rocket has been mandated to make use of the Shuttle solid rocket boosters and perhaps even the RS-25D engines from the shuttle program. Sounding much like the canceled Constellation program one has to wonder why this program will be different.
Already there is talk of cost over runs. During the joint Senate-NASA presentation in September 2011 the SLS program has a projected development cost of $18 billion through 2017, with $10B for the SLS rocket, $6B for the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and $2B for upgrades to the launch pad and other facilities at Kennedy Space Center. Representative Dana Rohrabacher said “There’s nothing new or innovative in this approach, especially its astronomical price tag, and that’s the real tragedy. Unfortunately, after a number of years, perhaps during development or just after a few flights like Saturn, budget pressures will bring this program to an end… this plan will suffer the same fate as Constellation: overpromised, under-delivered, and cancelled. Where will we be then?”
There are other alternatives to a totally new rocket including Delta IV, Atlas V and the Falcon. They are ready now or near ready so it is not clear why NASA needs to spend billions on a totally new rocket program when those billions could be used for other missions.
Hopefully at this Industry day the logic becomes clearer and we will learn more about this new program.



